Updates from LMHudson Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Unknown's avatar

    LMHudson 4:15 pm on February 24, 2024 Permalink | Reply  

    An Argument for Hugo Tapia 

    contributed by Toby Duffell

    THE DOCTOR IS IN

    Toby Duffell, reporting on the upcoming election.

    Concerned about the future of Tempe? So is Dr. Hugo Tapia, who is running for Tempe City Council. He spoke with me today about what concerns him in the city and how he hopes to address it.

    Hugo Tapia is an academic. The son of immigrant farmworker parents who never spoke English, Hugo is the eleventh of twelve children born into his family. He had to learn English and went on to earn three degrees culminating with a Doctorate in Counseling Psychology from Arizona State University. Married to Dr. Robbie Adler-Tapia, who is also a psychologist, they have two sons and a daughter and all three followed their parents calling; one is an Industrial/Organizational Psychologist, the second is a fifth-grade teacher, and the youngest is a Behavior Interventionist for Tempe Union High Schools. The Tapias are long-term residents of Tempe.

    My first question to Dr. Tapia was, why are you running for Councilman?

    Dr. Tapia: I’m concerned about what is going on in the city, and what it offers residents. When people move here, it’s because they wanted to – and decided to live here based on several factors, including the quality of life and sense of community. We need to guard those things that help define Tempe.

    I next asked him about the changes proposed in the 2050 plan to allow ‘Accessory Dwelling Units’ – ADUs – that will greatly increase housing density, traffic, crowding, and all the things that a land-locked City with no room to grow cannot accommodate. Dr. Tapia, what is your position on ADUs?

    Dr. Tapia: ADUs are being floated by the mayor with the rationale that they would add more living units in homeowners’ back yards, so that additional family members can move in. But that muddies the water. ADUs are rentals and there would be no restrictions to keep the new residents to those with a family connection – in fact, it would be impossible to enforce. So, what we would see instead, is growth of new properties that will add to the stock of rentals, either short-term like AirBnB with their associated turnover and dysfunction, or long-term, where new residents add a longstanding burden to the neighborhoods – roads, schools, services, and more. If we are to maintain and even grow a sense of community, we need to focus on property ownership and the stability that comes from it that you just don’t get with rentals. We need to prevent the housing stock becoming more and more one that residents will never have a chance to own. It may sound obvious, but homeownership develops community.

    There’s a bigger picture that worries residents, too. It seems that the ADUs are a construction of Corey Woods and his staff and they can’t be traced back to resident input. The ADU plan is being presented for a ‘Yes-No’ vote – and we already have an example of that approach with high-density apartment project that was presented as an ‘Entertainment District’ but was voted down. Is the mayor is trying again? An insider advised that Corey Woods has his eyes on a political career outside of Tempe, and it’s thought he won’t complete a next term but will leave for a job as a political lobbyist or consultant – and he wants to point to a list of wins here to help him. So what would you differently as a Councilman?”

    Dr. Tapia: “First, I’d listen. I’d take input from the residents in the community. I served on the board of Trellis Community Development in the City of Phoenix for about six years, so I know what works. But in Tempe, no-one in the city has truly asked people here what they want. Maybe our residents came to Tempe because they liked the idea of the way the city is – rightsized? Not how much it can be made more crowded, busier, noisier, with reduced green spaces, poorer air quality, a scarcer share of resources to residents, and all that goes with a city infrastructure straining under a huge extra load. And the first thing would demand of any developers is to prove to me what the benefits would be to the community they are building in.”

    This speaks to the concern homeowners have – that developers generally don’t live where their projects are built. Usually, they do a job, take their money, and leave with any problems they make staying behind. This concern is deepened by the funding some of the other candidates are receiving from commercial parties with a business interest. What’s your view?

    Dr. Tapia: “That’s why I won’t accept a penny from those groups! Unlike, for example, Randy Keating, with fully 60% of his campaign funding coming from developers, lobbyists, and land-use attorneys!”

    What else would you do?

    Dr. Tapia: The main job of the mayor and council is to ensure the safety and security of the community. And the principal way to do that is to have an effective, properly staffed and healthy Police department”. Tempe is already below the national average of Law Enforcement Officers per thousand residents for suburban areas and even further below that for high-crime areas, of which Tempe, I am sorry to say, is one. I’ve met and spoken with many of our Law Enforcement Officers, and my overwhelming impression is one of ordinary, decent people trying to do an extraordinary job. I’ve had some demanding assignments in my life, but I’d hate to be in the Police. The unfair criticism they’ve received, the attempts to discourage and defund them, and the tough, tough job they do with insufficient numbers and resources in a situation where they might not live through the day has to take its toll. So first I’d focus first on retaining and ensuring the mental health of the force we have, and adding to their numbers so they aren’t under an intolerable strain. Speaking of strain, it’s the repeated and extreme loads upon officers – called ‘cognitive load’, that blunts ordinary and decent people and can affect their whole outlook on life and work – no wonder there are so many officers leaving the force. I’d seek to make Tempe a city where Police officers would want to work. And that’s not going to be made any better by just ignoring the problem because supporting our Officers isn’t politically expedient.

    What would be your key message to voters on March 12?

    Dr. Tapia – “The reason I’m running for Council is so that people have a voice at the Council level. I’m a good listener – I’ve had to be, to do well in my profession. Now issues may come and go, but the source of approval for everything should come from the people who live here in Tempe and pay for what the city does. I believe the mayor and council are public servants to the community and not celebrities. I will represent the voice of the community.”

    Ballots for the upcoming election will be mailed to all Tempe residents in time for the March 12 election. Dr. Hugo Tapia’s office can be reached through http://www.Tapia4Tempe.com.

     
  • Unknown's avatar

    LMHudson 3:01 pm on February 20, 2024 Permalink | Reply  

    example ballot 

    Because there is no chain of custody, it is important not to leave ovals unmarked. (Someone else may fill them for you.) In the case of the mayor, you can make your intention clear simply by filling in the write-in oval and writing ‘none of the above.’ Filling in both ovals will spoil that portion of the ballot. It will not count as a vote for Woods.

     
  • Unknown's avatar

    LMHudson 5:26 pm on February 13, 2024 Permalink | Reply  

    Why hand-counting is a good thing 

    The Maricopa Republican party had its annual meeting on January 13, 2024. The purpose of that meeting is to elect officers, amend by-laws, and pass resolutions. About 2500 delegates were present, either in person or by proxy. This year, for the first time ever, we performed a hand count of the ballots. It took a little over an hour to count the first contest, with 10 candidates.

    I can testify that it was fun. Here is a short (3:45) video of the tally.

    The size of the electorate was comparable to the number of voters in a typical precinct. Ten contests is much simpler than a typical general election ballot, with perhaps 70 contests, but the same principle that makes the hand-count work — division into small problems — would permit us to divide a general election ballot into sections. Counters would count and announce the national and state contests first, then count the county and municipal contests, then count the judges, and then count the propositions.* With enough thought we might even figure out better ways of selecting judges, and I believe the citizen ballot initiatives are just plain wrong. All legislation should pass through the Legislature. Maybe we can simplify our ballots.

    I believe people will enjoy doing this, as I did. Most of the work will be done by volunteers. Neighborhoods are starved for this kind of social activity. The real benefit of the hand count will be, not faster results, saving money, or election integrity (although those are all benefits), but the encouragement of neighborhood civics.

    *On March 27, I helped tally a hand-counted election for 105 candidates, more contests than a typical general election. We divided the candidates into numerical groups of 25. Reporting a result took 3 hours for only about 140 ballots. There were some special circumstances that would not be true in a general election: over-voting was fatal and we took steps to exclude ballots which contained more than the maximum votes, and the results had to be rank-ordered. Most important, though, was that we had only 4 tally teams, proportional to the size of the electorate. A precinct of 2500 voters would probably want to field something like 30 teams. The speed of tally should be a linear function of the number of teams.

    Go here to register for hand count training.

     
  • Unknown's avatar

    LMHudson 3:36 pm on February 13, 2024 Permalink | Reply  

    One reason why the Legislature needs to go 

    On February 23, 2023, Wendy Rogers chaired a hearing on election fraud. The last speaker was Jacqueline Breger, who works as an insurance investigator. Ms Breger described a money-laundering scheme using recorded documents like mortgages and alleged that many public officials, including members of the Legislature, were beneficiaries. She named names. A copy of her testimony is here.

    The hearing ended abruptly. Liz Harris, Representative from District 13, was expelled from the Legislature. Did the Legislature investigate the claims? No. Did any of the defamed persons sue Breger for defamation? No. Instead, the Legislature dusted off SB1061 and passed it immediately. SB1061 (copy here) amends several statutes with the effect of permitting any eligible public official to stop the public from looking at their recorded documents.

    Here is the final vote tally in the Senate, and in the House. Governor Hobbs, one of those named in Breger’s testimony, signed it.

     
  • Unknown's avatar

    LMHudson 7:30 am on February 13, 2024 Permalink | Reply  

    Why vote? 

    The fraud originally was small-scale, aimed at close contests where only a handful of votes were necessary. November 2020 forced a bigger fraud, and it was clumsy. Too many pieces were visible. Even if we hypothesize that the techniques have improved, it is still a big task to insert thousands of fraudulent ballots. We don’t know for sure, but we hope the fraud is finite. Enough votes may be able to overwhelm it.

    The fraud depends also on the narrative spread by the media. For years in Arizona, we heard about voters immigrating from California and continuing to vote left. In 2022, we heard that single women voted Democrat to punish the Republicans for the Dobbs decision. What narrative is going to explain a Trump loss in 2024?

     
  • Unknown's avatar

    LMHudson 3:22 pm on February 12, 2024 Permalink | Reply  

    State Senator — District 12 

    Cara Vicini (Republican) will oppose Mitzi Epstein (Democrat).

    Cara, thankfully, does not have Uniparty support. She is trying to run ‘Clean,’ as well.

    I will vote for Cara, on Election Day.

     
  • Unknown's avatar

    LMHudson 2:50 pm on February 12, 2024 Permalink | Reply  

    Presidential Preference Election (PPE) 

    Unlike the primary this summer, only registered Republicans can vote, so please register as a Republican. You can do that here.

    The winner of this election will get all of Arizona’s votes in the Republican convention in Milwaukee in July. The electors are only bound on the first ballot, however.

    Why have this election? Clearly Donald Trump is the nominee, right?

    The Republican party is a corporation whose purpose is to raise money, not win elections. The big donors do not want Trump to be the nominee and can be expected to try to steal the convention from him.

    The Maricopa County Republican Committee, of which I am a member, first tried to cancel this election and learned that, if it were canceled, Arizona would be penalized in the number of delegates it can send to the Milwaukee convention. We then tried to get permission to conduct the election on a single day, with hand-counted paper ballots. We needed the permission of the state party and they refused, saying it would be too expensive. We then learned that the Arizona Secretary of State pays for this type of election, even though only one political party ‘benefits.’ We learned that the state had already budgeted $8 million to conduct this election and they were unwilling to cancel it.

    Only the Democrats ran a PPE in 2020, and it was probably stolen. As usual, we have only circumstantial evidence and no one wants to try this case as it is a case of Democrats stealing from Democrats. Here is the evidence:

    The county government provides a file called Final Voted, or VM55, to the political parties. This file is a list of the names and addresses of the people who voted. It does not show how people voted — eg Biden or Sanders — but it shows the manner of voting, eg in person on Election Day, by mail, etc. The county government made a mistake and provided different copies of the file to different recipients. One copy, provided to the state Republican party and uploaded into the party’s national database, is significantly different from the copy provided to the county Republican party. The first copy shows many people voting who were actually not eligible to vote because they were not Democrats. The second copy shows only Democrats voting. More ineligible voters voted in the first copy than the margin by which Biden won Maricopa County. We did not systematically canvass these people but we knew some of them and they denied voting in the PPE.

    If you have 6 minutes, you can see me presenting this case to an Election Integrity summit in the summer of 2022, here.

    Tina Peters — at the time clerk for Mesa County, Colorado, which includes Grand Junction — noticed that there were three databases on the Dominion software Mesa County was using to run an election, and ever since, the same people who are trying to keep Donald Trump off the ballot in Colorado have been trying to put Ms Peters in jail.

    On the PPE ballot will be:

    • Binkley, Ryan L.
    • Castro, John Anthony
    • Christie, Chris
    • DeSantis, Ron
    • Haley, Nikki
    • Hutchinson, Asa
    • Ramaswamy, Vivek
    • Stuckenberg, David
    • Trump, Donald J.

    Please join me in voting for Donald Trump.

     
  • Unknown's avatar

    LMHudson 11:24 am on February 12, 2024 Permalink | Reply  

    City Council and Mayor 

    There is no one to vote for here. Please remember to fill in all the ovals on your ballot so that no one else can vote it for you. There is no chain of custody.

     
  • Unknown's avatar

    LMHudson 11:19 am on February 12, 2024 Permalink | Reply  

    Proposition 478 

    Do we approve the General Plan 2050? No. I can add nothing to what Tempe1st wrote here.

     
  • Unknown's avatar

    LMHudson 4:01 pm on February 3, 2024 Permalink | Reply  

    Maricopa County Recorder 

    The Legislature has delegated the authority for running elections to the Secretary of State, through the Election Procedures Manual, and then to the county recorders. This post should be ministerial, but, in fact, it has enormous law-making power. The case that elections are corrupted is familiar, and does not need to be repeated here. Don Hiatt was the first to make the additional argument that precinct-level hand counting would also save money. His website is here.

    There are two other candidates in the Republican primary:

    • Justin Heap (Republican)
    • Stephen Richer (the incumbent, registered as a Republican)

    A third Republican candidate, Claire Van Steenwyk, withdrew Mar 12 and endorsed Hiatt. You will notice a familiar pattern: There is only one Democrat candidate, and three Republicans. The Uniparty may not care whether Heap or Richer (or Stringham, the Democrat) wins, but having many candidates provides a narrative for Hiatt’s defeat. Heap entered the race late, with lots of money and the endorsement of leading Republicans. He purchased many if not most of his 8,106 signatures while Hiatt gathered his 7,324 signatures at no cost, using volunteers. Because Heap has the backing of the establishment, he can claim to be ‘electable.’ Hiatt poses a real threat to Uniparty control of the election machinery. If he were to run alone against Richer, it might be hard to explain why he lost. With Heap in the race, the narrative can be that Heap and Hiatt split the anti-Richer vote, allowing Richer to win.

    When Heap decided to enter the race for county recorder, he was serving as Representative in the Legislature for District 10 and planning to run for re-election. Replacing him on the primary ballot will be his father, Ralph.

    I will vote for Hiatt, the only outsider, on Election Day.

     
  • Unknown's avatar

    LMHudson 7:29 am on January 31, 2024 Permalink | Reply  

    State Representative — District 12 

    At the time of writing it appears I am the only Republican candidate. In the general election, there will be two Democratic candidates, Patty Contreras and Stacey Travers, both incumbent.

    For too long, the Republican strategy has been to appear moderate, in contrast with the Democrats, who are reliably insane. This strategy sets up a destructive dynamic: the Democrats can move ever further left and the Republicans validate the drift. Republicans elected this way betray us. This is the strategy of the Uniparty.

    I run to achieve one thing: true reform of our elections. My slogan is One Day One Vote No Machines. Unless we regain the ability to vote, we will continue to lose, on the border, on the schools, on government spending. We can have only one priority.

    It will require a miracle to send this message to our governing class. We work and pray for a miracle. We do not despair. We do not give up. We are not slaves until we accept our slavery.

    I am trying to run Clean.

    .

     
  • Unknown's avatar

    LMHudson 1:57 pm on May 13, 2023 Permalink | Reply  

    City of Tempe Propositions 301, 302, and 303 

    contributed by Toby Duffell

    The Coyotes, V1, V2, and You

    It was the end of a long week in New York city at the engineering company where I worked. Daydreams about the coming weekend floated in my head, the untouched draft report on my lap, a markup pen idle in my hand. Returning to Phoenix Skyharbor aboard a United 757, nothing seemed out of the ordinary – it was a bright, calm Friday afternoon as the craft crossed the outer marker coming in to land. But as the airplane arrowed in above the scores of tire marks left from first contact by previous landings there was a steep, sudden drop in altitude followed by a scream from both the Rolls Royce engines as the airplane abruptly nosed up. The runway seemed awfully close, awfully quickly . . . sitting towards to the front, I could hear alarms sounding in the cockpit above the rong-rong-rong of twin engines laboring to provide additional thrust. An unfortunate lady in business class cabin crew forgot herself and exclaimed shit! We had experienced a weather condition called wind shear, an invisible killer that can suck the lift from an aircraft and can cause it to pancake onto unforgiving blacktop, with damage ranging from undercarriage collapse, impaired control surfaces, through to loss of the hull. This is a nightmare for pilots and their training is to get the hell out. Forget about landing, engage maximum thrust, gain altitude, landing gear up, don’t attempt to turn.

    Not everyone was as lucky as me and the flight I was on. As early as 1985, Delta flight 191 crashed on final approach to the Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport due to wind shear. A total of 135 people died in the accident, including 126 of the 152 passengers on board, 8 of 11 crew members and even a motorist on the ground. In the last 25 years, there have been 27 crashes due to wind shear. It’s not a matter of if instead it’s when. So given this inevitability, the concern becomes if it’s going to happen, how best can it be escaped from safely? In other words: How can we avoid threats to surviving shear? An aircraft experiencing a sudden loss of lift due to windshear above the proposed obstacle of the Coyotes stadium at the edge of the airport could be a disaster from which most or all on board may not escape. Add a capacity audience and we could experience the worst disaster in aviation history. You wouldn’t want to be there.

    Another scenario that keeps Civil Aviation Captains and their First Officers awake at night is engine failure on takeoff. Termed EFTO this is the time when the engines encounter their most taxing conditions – by working the hardest to get the craft airborne from a standing start. The pilot spools up the engines to takeoff thrust, releases the ground brakes, and the airplane is propelled forward with the plan of passing V1 (the speed beyond which takeoff cannot safely be aborted) as quickly as possible through to V2, the takeoff safety speed when getting off the ground and avoiding obstacles is possible. Engine failure between V1 and V2 results in the flight crew on board having to try to take off. There is no alternative – remaining on the ground would result in “running out of runway” and a collision with whatever lay beyond the stopway area at the end of the runway. So what are those in control of the craft trained to do? The instinct to turn around and circle back should be avoided – that risks the craft losing speed, slipping into a turn and further losing altitude. If the Coyotes stadium lies before a crippled aircraft the design gap – the separation between the structure and an aircraft with an engine out – is thirty-five feet. Meaning, that the craft could pass within the length of three automobiles from the top of the stadium. With a wet runway, that gap can reduce to fifteen feet. Now add gusting, or windshear, or bird strikes affecting both engines, or a second’s indecision in the cockpit and there could be a disaster. Add a capacity stadium and there could be a tragedy.

    So yes, I am opposed to building a high-capacity stadium with a thousand attendees directly under the flight path of heavy commercial airliners taking off or coming in to land. I am also opposed to building high-density apartment blocks with thousands of dwellers in the same place. Like you, I don’t want to be in a commercial jet barreling down on a stadium. And I don’t want to be in that stadium, either, or anyone I know. Or anyone I remotely know. Or anyone at all.

    So why is this proposal before the voters of Tempe? Has Mayor Corey – whose signs were up in my front yard, whose fund-raiser I attended, and for whom I ultimately voted – has Mayor Corey been dazzled by the prospect of a glamorous political win? Are the local Urban Planners who call the project “Voterville” or “Coreytown” being cynical? Is Mr. Woods looking to beef up his resume in furtherance of his long-term political aims? There’s nothing wrong with that – we should all be allowed to realize our ambitions. But, given the risks, isn’t there a safer way for him to do it?

    Editor’s Note: Toby is a licensed engineer with several decades of experience in military and commercial systems including those for the USAF, RAF and civilian ground-based transportation systems. He co-authored “National Design Standards and Safety Guidelines” which has been translated into German, French and Chinese. He is a Senior Member of the IEEE in the USA, and held licensure in the UK and Western Europe.

     
  • Unknown's avatar

    LMHudson 4:51 pm on October 9, 2022 Permalink | Reply  

    Some ideas on voting 

    First, vote in person, on Election Day. If the county sends you a mail-in ballot, fill it out, bring it, but leave it in your car. If the lines are too long, you can always deposit your mail-in ballot in the blue urn, but please try to vote in person. That action will send a message to the Legislature that we are serious about getting rid of mail-in voting.

    Get the Votifynow app for your phone so that you can report anything that goes wrong. (There are other reporting sites that are legitimate but I know the people at Votifynow.) If the polling location claims you have already voted, call the sheriff.

    Use a blue ball-point. This has nothing to do with smearing or bleeding-through. Marks made with black felt-tips are very hard to distinguish from marks made by machine. If there is a forensic audit, we want to be able to distinguish marks made by humans from those made by machine.

    In the notes I concentrate on the races that I had to research. Many of the Republican candidates are less-than-inspiring but I fear their Democrat opponents will be quite destructive. We must simplify our ballot if we are ever to get rid of the counting machines. The races that require research are often also races that don’t belong on the ballot.

    Until we are allowed to know how these counting machines work, I am adopting an extra precaution that I hope turns out to be barmy: I fear not voting invites someone else to fill in the ovals. It is not much more work to fill in all the ovals so that can’t happen.

    I hope this helps someone.

     
    • Rich's avatar

      Rich 2:43 pm on November 7, 2022 Permalink | Reply

      I don’t know who you are, but thank you for putting this extensive amount of information up. It has been extremely helpful, but unfortunately extremely disappointing in the case of Temp Union no. 213 governing board members. They are all absolutely awful.

      Like

  • Unknown's avatar

    LMHudson 3:26 pm on October 9, 2022 Permalink | Reply  

    ballot November 8, 2022 

     
  • Unknown's avatar

    LMHudson 2:47 pm on October 9, 2022 Permalink | Reply  

    Central AZ Water Conserv Dist 

    The environmentalists wish to gain control of authorities like this, the SRP, and, of course, the Corporation Commission. I will vote for the slate containing Lundgren, Monize, Neese, and Seago. (They are all Republicans.) There is no requirement to vote for five.

    Slates are useful, like brand names (such as Republican, only better). They show that the members all know and trust one another and presumably will work well together in office.

     
  • Unknown's avatar

    LMHudson 2:33 pm on October 9, 2022 Permalink | Reply  

    Propositions 

    In 2020, the backers of Prop 208 (almost all from outside Arizona) spent $20 million. Nothing comes close in 2022. Both the Save our Schools and Arizonans for Free and Fair Elections propositions failed to get enough signatures.

    Constititutional Amendments: 128, 129, 130, 131, and 132

    Prop 128: gives the Legislature power to override initiatives or referenda that are found by either the US or Arizona Supreme Courts to contain illegal or unconstitutional language. Anything that discourages initiatives is good. Vote ‘Yes.’

    Prop 129: limits initiatives to a single subject and requires that subject to be in the title. Here are the arguments. One of arguments ‘against’ is:

    “Proposition 129 is a direct attack on our ability to make change through the ballot initiative process.”

    That, for me, is an argument ‘for.’ Vote ‘Yes.’

    Prop 130: corrects language in the Constitution that prevents honorably-discharged veterans from receiving a property tax exemption. Gives power to the Legislature. Vote ‘Yes.’

    Prop 131: creates a Lieutenant Governor, to run on the same ticket as the Governor. Under present law, the Secretary of State succeeds the Governor. There are too many elective offices and this profusion makes the officers less, not more accountable to the voters. It also makes our ballots too complicated. I hope this is a move in the direction of Governor-appointed Secretaries of State, Attorneys General, and Superintendents of Public Instruction. Vote ‘Yes.’

    Prop 132: requires a majority of 60% for any constitutional amendment that enacts a tax. Vote ‘Yes.’

    Citizen Initiatives: 209 and 211

    The content of these initiatives doesn’t matter. Laws passed this way are impossible to amend. Vote ‘No’ and force the Legislature to deal with these questions.

    Legislative Referrals: 308, 309, and 310

    Prop 308: makes in-state tuition available to illegal immigrants under some conditions. Vote ‘No.’

    Prop 309: requires additional ID to be submitted with mailed-in ballots; requires photo ID for in-person voting. (Present law requires only a signature to validate mail-in ballots and permits in-person voting with no photo ID as long as you can supply two pieces of ID with the same address. As a pollworker, I was forced to let someone vote once with a utility bill and a Starbucks loyalty card.) These are improvements but we cannot allow this band-aid to replace real reform. Vote ‘Yes’ and keep fighting for something like HR2289 (one day, no machines).

    Prop 310: proposes a dedicated 0.1% state sales tax for the benefit of fire districts. Dedicated taxes are almost always a bad idea. Vote ‘No’ and make the firefighters go through the appropriations process like everyone else.

     
  • Unknown's avatar

    LMHudson 6:15 pm on October 8, 2022 Permalink | Reply  

    Justices and Judges 

    In the 2020 general, all the judges were returned to office by Soviet margins: over a million votes for each Supreme Court justice, and, in Maricopa County, about over half a million votes for each Appeals Court judge and each (of 40 ) Superior Court judges. Even actual campaigns against judges like Christopher Coury (who incurred the wrath of Red for Ed by ruling against Prop 208) barely dented their popularity. Only Jo Lynn Gentry, against whom both the Democrat party and the Commission on Judicial Performance review had turned, ‘barely’ won, with 9x the margin by which Biden beat Trump in Arizona.

    One million voters labored hard, to research their choices and fill out over 50 ballot questions.

    We will never get rid of the voting machines as long as we permit races like these on the ballot. I protest by voting ‘No’ on every one. Not voting is an invitation to allow someone else to fill in the ovals.

     
    • Jim's avatar

      Jim 4:16 pm on October 25, 2022 Permalink | Reply

      I disagree with voting “No” on the SC Justices. Beene, Montgomery, and Timmer saved us from the so-called “Free and Fair Elections” initiative. Extremists on the left are mounting a campaign to not retain them. They may need help.

      Like

  • Unknown's avatar

    LMHudson 10:30 am on October 8, 2022 Permalink | Reply  

    Kyrene Elem No. 28 Governing Board Member 

    Three are running for two slots. Only one is not a leftist. You don’t have to vote for 2.

    Kevin Walsh, incumbent, a Democrat. Here is his facebook page.

    Triné Nelson, incumbent, a Democrat. Here is her website.

    Kristi Ohman, a Republican. Here is her facebook page.

    Enrollment in the district has dropped from just under 17,000 pre-COVID to about 14,000.

     
  • Unknown's avatar

    LMHudson 2:54 pm on October 7, 2022 Permalink | Reply  

    Tempe Union No. 213 Questions 1,2, and 3 

    Enrollment has plummeted from 13,360 pre-COVID to 11,000. Nevertheless, the district schools are always looking for more money. Tempe Union takes over 20% of my property tax bill.

    Vote ‘No’ on all three questions and use your Arizona Tax Credit to give money to Valley Christian.

     
  • Unknown's avatar

    LMHudson 8:11 am on October 7, 2022 Permalink | Reply  

    Tempe Union No. 213 High School Governing Board Member 

    There are 3 candidates for 2 slots. Please help me find the most conservative one. The candidates are:

    Stephan Kingsley. His website is here. He was once a Republican, when he was Stephanie, but now he is a Democrat.

    Amanda Steele. Her website is here. She is a Democrat.

    Andres Barraza. He is incumbent. His website is here. He is a Democrat.

    Notice that I voted for all 3 on the sample ballot. Since only 2 votes are permitted, this will cause the Dominion scanner to count my votes as overvotes and none will be counted. If I leave the ovals blank, someone might fill them in for me.

     
c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel